China quietly pressuring North Korea

China exported no crude oil to North Korea in December, according to Chinese customs administration reports. China delivered the entirety of its September oil exports to the United States as opposed to the typical 50,000 metric tons per month shipped to North Korea. China exported about 125,000 tons of crude oil, valued at $62 million to the United States.

North Korea relies on China for 90 percent of its crude oil supply, the remainder coming from Iran. There is no official explanation for the cuts. Beijing has not announced any plan to eliminate oil exports to North Korea and officials at the China National Petroleum Corp. declined to comment.

Although the September export cut could be an anomaly, it's more likely that the cut was in response to North Korea's July ballistic missile test. The Oct. 9 nuclear test could further strengthen China's willingness to withhold oil from Kim Jong-Il's regime. China surprised many observers with their endorsement of the UN sanctions in response to the nuclear test.

The growing threat of North Korean instability to Beijing along with pressure from the United States seems a likely prompt for China's cooperation with the sanctions. If China becomes an ally in the North Korean crisis, the tables might finally shift, resulting in an imminent collapse of the Pyongyang regime. Or war. Either way, the status quo has begun a dramatic shift.

Read more:

China cut off exports of oil to North Korea - International Herald Tribune

Chinese pressure forces North Korea to apologise -- The Guardian (UK)

North Korea threatens war if Seoul enforces sanctions

Pyongyang has threatened war if South Korea joins the UN mandated sanctions in response to the October nuclear test. On the surface, this seems provacative and suggestive that hostilities would resume if the South participates in the sanctions. However, North Korea has a long and predictable history of posturing in response to potential economic damage.

The so-called "Sunshine Policy" of former South Korean President Kim Dae-Jung called for an opening of communication and economic partnerships with their Stalinist friends to the North. Current South Korean President Roh Moo-Hyun has continued Kim's engagement strategy which has manifested itself most evidently in the Kaesong Industrial Complex. The Kaesong project is a joint manufacturing facility located on the northern side of the DMZ. President Kim's Sunshine ambitions could be foiled if the South participates in the UN sanctions. The Sunshine Policy has been a failure if success is measured by the North's willingness to dismantle its nuclear program.

Former US President Bill Clinton attempted a diplomatic end to the North's nuclear ambition in 1994 with the Agreed Framework. The Framework provided for light-water nuclear reactors for civilian power generation in exchange for the decommissioning of heavy-water (weapons capable) reactors. The attempted engagement by the United States resulted in a decline of regional security because, quite simply, the North failed to deliver on their side of the agreement, while the US still provided the light-water technology.

The current Pyongyang threat mimics the ongoing strategy of North Korea to use fear as a means to get what it wants. Seoul is faced with a critical decision, the results of which will determine the future of the North Korean regime. If Seoul caves (as they usually have) to the North's threat, then Kim Jong-Il would have effectively proven that threats and posturing will work in influencing Seoul. On the other hand, if the South decides to adhere to the UN mandate, then Kim-Jong-Il will have two choices: return to the six-party talks and disarm its nuclear program or launch an attack on the South.

Although possible war is a horrible extention of foreign policy, the alternative is that North Korea will have effectivly bypassed the UN sanctions and will still be able to continue developing nuclear weapons technology. It would be best for Seoul to press Pyongyang now, while the North's nuclear program is in its infancy, rather than wait until later when the threat of nuclear strikes increases to a dangerous level.

Sun Tzu said in his Art of War, attack when your enemy is at its weakest. The North Korean regime could be at a breaking point. The important straw for this East Asian camel will be if Seoul decides to call the North's bluff and agree to the enforcement of UN sanctions. If Seoul does not have the courage to fight now, the result will be a strong and nuclear armed North with an eye towards Tokyo, Seoul and even Beijing.

North Korean defectors, America and WMD

If anyone doubts America being the land of opportunity, one should simply ask a North Korean defector. Living in Korea, I routinely field questions about U.S. policy and hegemony. Many people, especially other Westerners are quick to defend North Korea and their nuclear ambitions. One common argument is that if America has nuclear weapons, then it's hypocrisy to object to North Korea having said weapons. This argument is full of holes.

The first counter to that suggestion is that the U.S. has a statute preventing nuclear usage in a first-strike scenario. North Korea has publicly stated a willingness to use nuclear ballistic missiles against the U.S. North Korea and Iran are among the only nuclear-potential or nuclear-capable nations that have declared a willingness for first-strike nuclear usage. This critical policy difference is the fundamental factor in the logic to deny weapons technology to those countries. Even in Iraq, where tactical nuclear weapons could be effectively employed, the U.S. has not used WMD. Without delving into the potentially classified areas of our military strategy, it's obvious that the U.S. has no plans for nuclear usage in a first-strike scenario, even in a difficult war such as in Iraq.

North Korea, by its own admission has readied plans for WMD attacks on Seoul, Japan and the United States. These plans are only countered by two things: a lack of delivery technology and the U.S. deterrent.

The North Korean Nuclear Test

The US is preparing a list of additional sanctions in response to North Korea's preparation for a nuclear test. A provision in the sanctions provides for search and seizure of North Korean sea shipments which escalates the intensity of the present situation to a new level.

North Korea has never tested its proported nuclear capabilities and until recently, plans for such tests have never been revealed by the Pyongyang government. The latest announcement of a planned test should concern the world community as it increases the stakes of the East Asian situation. North Korea has a history of ratcheting up their posturing when faced with diplomatic challenges.

Shinzo Abe, the new Japanese prime minister has throughout his career favored a stronger stance against North Korean hostilities. His recent installation in Japan's top job might be a significant impetus that could prompt North Korea to expand their blackmailing strategy.
A nuclear test would be a significant development in the East Asian situation.

Proposed US countermeasures, including the maritime provisions could push North Korea away from posturing and closer to actual hostilities. The critical element in this standoff will be Russia and China. If Russia and China side with the US and the United Nations, then North Korea might be economically influenced enough to either eliminate their nuclear program or perhaps respark the Korean War.